Anychart ios12/23/2023 For example it is possible that we get 4ghz or over for an M3 Max that goes strictly to the 16" Mbp or Mac Studio? They are bragging now, but by end of next Q4 their leads may have been largely diminished or evaporated.Ĭlick to expand.I wanted to ask you.with this Apple thing of scaling, from core design from A17 to the M family.how hard is for Apple to try to let or modify the clock freq based on the thermals that goes in it. There is going to be enough improvements of AMD/Intel stuff in that narrow subset of packages they are trying to cover now. If Qualcomm just took this die baseline and just moved it to N3E with some improvements to various subsystems that would be a more sane next move than to try to branch out into trying to cover more AMD/Intel stuff. If going after phones then likely will need some E-cores ( smaller footprint and power ), and that also will soak up resources that will limit die instance number creep. So there is lots of other places that they want to take these cores and likely only have a finite set of folks to do the work. Qualcomm talked alot about pushing these Oryon cores into phones SoC, XR headset SoCs, etc. Elite X gen 2 might be broader in number of physical dies. Qualcomm talked about that this is just the first generation. They might loose against AMD's upcoming 8000 updates that slap a much larger iGPU into the package, but I don't think that is going to be in the same price zone either. Most of the real competition is against Intel's iGPUs so they have health margin lead. I suspect that Qualcomm has probably stretched their iGPU pretty far and this will be as big as it gets. I don't think there is a Max coming at all. which for a M2 Max likely gets better performance. Also Qualcomm likely doesn't have the P-core clusters on as tight a bandwidth consumption limiter as Apple does ( Apple needs to save bandwidth space for their GPU. That is somewhat tractable if uses some highly optimized N4P versus Apple's trailing edge N5/N5P of M2. But if they choose to 'dial back' to the same constraints as Apple. So they designed something that ranges out further into the TDP consumption zone than Apple does. Their main competitive is the AMD/Intel which do. What Qualcomm is saying is that if you just want to get a score of 2,841 ( the lower score), they can do that at 30% less power than the M2 Max.įrom the diagrams is looks like Qualcomm's package will shot past where the Apple packages tend to top on power consumption. "not beating it" isn't really questionable. In the graph, their processor is getting a score of 3,227 which is this universe is a larger number than 2,841. That's pretty impressive for a 1st gen product. I knew Qualcomm would do fairly well on 1st gen and will likely take share away from AMD and Intel. Like I said, it's impressive for 1st gen though.ĭisclaimer: A bulk of my investment portfolio is Apple stocks with a tiny bit of Qualcomm stock. There's no doubt that Qualcomm wanted to do this press release before M3 otherwise, they'd look stupid comparing it to M2. If Apple is more aggressive with clocks, I could see 3,700. Therefore, one can reasonably expect M3 Max to reach a 3,500 ST score at minimum. Right now, PC makers compete with Apple Silicon by over-prescribing RAM/SSD to create more value and use more expensive Nvidia GPUs - all of which eats into their profit margins.Ī17 Pro is 26% faster ST than A15. Quite honestly, PC makers desperately need this to have any decent competition with Apple Silicon. It's still impressive for a 1st gen product and should take some market share away from Intel/AMD. It will actually go up against M3, M3 Pro, M3 Max given that Apple is rumored to release them next week or Spring 2024. Are they using TDP? Average? Max? ISO power? However, it's not exactly clear how they're measuring power. Oryon CPU looks like an M2 Pro class product, not max. Also, they should probably be comparing to M2 Pro - not Max for ST. But to get the 3200 score, they might be using 30% more power than M2 Max. So if they downclock to get a 2800 score, it uses 30% less power than M2 Max. It says "matching" uses 30% less power - not beating it. Note that the Apple Silicon comparison is a little misleading.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |